At his trial, why did Nazi Adolf Eichmann argue that he had done nothing wrong?
A. He did not break any laws of his country.
B. He was being falsely accused of committing acts that he had not committed.
C. He was coerced into doing what he had done because his family would have been sent to prison or exterminated if he had not followed orders.
D. He believed morality was a private choice.
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
"On Monday, Regina went to Kentucky Fried Chicken for lunch. On Wednesday, she went to Burger King for lunch. On Thursday, she went to the Hungry Heifer Steakhouse for lunch. So, Regina is probably not a vegetarian." This illustrates a(n) ________.
A. valid deductive argument B. strong inductive argument C. invalid deductive argument D. weak inductive argument
Identify any formal fallacies or fallacies of language in the following passage.If Shelley has read the Republic, then she's bound to know who Thrasymachus is. And, since she clearly does know who Thrasymachus is, we can conclude that she must have read the Republic.
What will be an ideal response?
Michele Bachmann uses an emotional appeal in her remarks about HPV vaccinations. What other fallacy does she commit?
A. Anecdotal evidence B. Hasty generalization C. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc D. All of the above
"Corporate infighting," "management power struggles," "maneuvering and politics and power grabbing" and
"Machiavellian intrigues" are all phrases H. Ross Perot uses to describe
a. the reality of family life today. b. the reality of corporate life today. c. the reality of the lunch room. d. the reality of the drive into work.