How does the presence and strength of social bonds explain change in offending?
What will be an ideal response?
Importantly, the stability of the social bond is not a given. The social bond remains strong only so long as it is nourished by interaction with conventional others. If youngsters become distant from parents, give up on going to college and caring about grades, or are cut from sports teams, their bonds can attenuate. And if bonds weaken, crime can take place. Because bonds can vary in strength across time--for example, weaker in the teenage years, stronger before and after--people can move into and out of illegal conduct. Adult offenders might desist from crime if they enter a quality marriage or get a good job. In short, the presence and strength of social bonds can explain change in offending.
You might also like to view...
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is part of the Department of ____________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Which of the following individual factors is NOT a risk factor for intimate partner violence?
a. Depression b. Insecurity c. Narcissism d. Empathy
Which of the following is not a category of victims' rights specifically associated with the court system?
A. the right to be informed B. the right to testify C. the right to attend D. the right to be heard
The most important factor when considering desistance is
a. the inmate's ability to find employment. b. frequent meetings with a parole officer. c. counseling and substance abuse programming. d. the individual inmate's desire to remain free.