Is it necessarily TRUE that people who make different moral judgments about the same action have different conceptions of morality? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer will vary.
You might also like to view...
State two common objections to libertarianism. A. First, it would be unreasonable to require wealthy people to sacrifice theliberty to spend their money on social programs and activities, and second,the right to welfare is a guaranteed right from both a libertarian and liberalperspective
B. First, it would be unreasonable to require wealthy people to support anyonebut themselves since it would go against their own self-interests, and second,the right to welfare is an inherently unreasonable construct. C. First, wealthy people should be required to sacrifice the liberty to do whatthey want with their wealth so that the poor has the liberty to meet their basic needs, and second, the right to welfare from a libertarian perspective is much less just than the right to welfare from a liberal perspective. D. First, it would be unreasonable to require wealthy people to sacrifice the liberty to do what they want with their wealth so that the poor has the liberty to meet their basic needs, and second, the right to welfare from a libertarian perspective significantly differs from a liberal one.
"Chun-tzu" literally means
A) The lord's son B) The son of God C) Weakness D) Virtue
Based on Kant's emphasis on reason, morality would apply to all of the following EXCEPT
a. normal adults b. children and the mentally challenged c. sentient being from another planet d. individuals from different cultures than our own
According to Epictetus, God's role in the universe is:
a. to communicate with all things. b. to direct all things. c. to survey all things. d. to be present in all things. e. all of these answers.