Sal was at home going through his normal workout when he bent his barbell bar. Sal is a professional bodybuilder, and this fact is obvious from his appearance. Sal went to his local sporting-goods store and was approached by a clerk wishing to assist

him. Sal told the clerk about his problem and the clerk asked Sal to wait while an appropriate bar was located. The clerk presented Sal with a bar that the clerk said "is just what you need for your type of weight requirements." Sal paid for the bar and was returning home when he stopped at a health food restaurant. The drink that he ordered had an unusual taste, but the food establishment refused a refund. Sal became ill from the drink, which, as it turned out, had a toxic substance in it. Sal had to be hospitalized. When Sal was able to work out again, he attached the weights to the new bar and lifted the bar under his chin. The bar snapped in the middle and severely cut Sal. Sal is angry about the drink and the barbell. What are the applicable warranties involved? Does Sal have a cause of action?


?The sale of food or drink is a sale of goods. When such a sale is made by a merchant, as is the situation in this case, there is an implied warranty that the drink is fit for human consumption. Because the drink contained a toxic substance, there was a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, allowing Sal to recover damages. This would be the court's finding regardless of whether the jurisdiction in which the case is tried applies the "foreign substance/natural substance" liability test or the "reasonable expectations" test.
Under an implied warranty of fitness for normal use, there is liability if a product fails when it is being utilized in an ordinary manner. In this case, the barbell did not perform normally.
The sporting goods store could argue that Sal placed too much weight on the bar and that this constitutes misuse or assumption of the risk. However, Sal could argue that an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose existed. The clerk knew of Sal's purpose. Sal relied on the clerk to pick the appropriate bar. It also was obvious from Sal's appearance that the amount of weight that the bar would have to withstand would be substantial.

Business

You might also like to view...

Predatory pricing is the practice of setting prices below cost for the purpose of eliminating unsold merchandise

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Business

When is a taxpayer's work assignment in a new locale temporary? Permanent? What difference does it make?

What will be an ideal response?

Business

The Industry Leader (Scenario)Frank, the new CEO for First Fidelity, is working hard to turn around the formerly successful real estate business. His goal is to make First Fidelity a leader in the industry. He understands the importance of improving organizational productivity in achieving his goals. Mark is keen to improve organizational performance and effectiveness.The operations manager suggests a hike in the prices to improve productivity. However, Frank rules this option out. What could be the possible reason for this?

A. Product prices are not related to organizational productivity. B. Selling price is negatively correlated to organizational productivity. C. The real estate business is characterized by intense competition. D. Such an action would lead to reduced employee satisfaction.

Business

Which of the following would most likely be enforceable?

A) An agreement supported by past consideration B) A substitute agreement to settle an undisputed debt C) A debt agreed to seven years ago in a state where the statute of limitations is six years D) A promise following the rendering of emergency services that is not supported by new consideration

Business