According to your Adler and Proctor textbook, relationships between superiors and subordinates can be placed on a continuum. Explain this continuum.
What will be an ideal response?
At one end are leader–member exchange relationships. LMX relationships, considered to be in-group relationships, are characterized by mutual trust, social support, and liking. There is much more interaction between organizational members in an LMX relationship than in other types. At the other end of the continuum are supervisory exchange (SX) relationships. Interaction between the supervisor and subordinate is defined entirely by the roles they perform and the contractual obligations provided by the organization. In short, SX relationships are out-group relationships; they are impersonal, with little superior–subordinate interaction taking place. At the midpoint of the continuum are middle-group relationships. Not surprisingly, these relationships involve elements of both LMX and SX relationships. Interaction is often impersonal, but there are occasional provisions of social support. Moderate amounts of trust and liking occur between the supervisor and the subordinate. Individuals in the middle-group are often aware they are not in the in-group.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is an example of a territorial marker?
a. standing several feet away from a stranger at a bus stop b. always sitting in the same seat for every class c. leaving your sweater on a chair in the library as you go to the bathroom d. all of these
A group?s focus on the task, the agenda, and being organized would be known as ________
Fill in the blanks with correct word
Mask
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following is a common downfall of online groups?
A. Online group members often find that they are incapable of finishing assigned projects on time. B. Online groups are often less convenient than groups that meet face-to-face. C. Online groups are always more time consuming than groups that always meet face-to-face. D. Online group members are often less committed to the group than members of groups who meet face-to-face.