Polly sold Jason a used car for $1,000 . Their contract provided that the engine in the car was in good shape, a true statement as far as Polly knew. Unfortunately, the day after Jason purchased the car, it broke down and was discovered to have significant engine problems. Jason told Polly that he wanted a refund. Polly told him that he was not entitled to a refund because she did not lie and
that as far as she knew, there was nothing wrong with the car. Which of the following is true?
a. Jason is entitled to a refund because of a breach of an express warranty.
b. Jason is entitled to a refund because of a breach of the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
c. Jason is entitled to a refund only if he can obtain evidence that Polly lied.
d. Jason is not entitled to a refund under any circumstances because the vehicle was used.
a
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements best describes re-direct examination?
A) The plaintiff's attorney questions the witness who was questioned by the defendant's attorney. B) The plaintiff's attorney questions the witness before he or she is questioned by the defendant's attorney. C) The defendant's attorney questions the witness who was questioned by the plaintiff's attorney. D) The defendant's attorney questions the witness before he or she is questioned by the plaintiff's attorney.
Which of the following circumstances could result in an award of damages in a wrongful dismissal action being lower?
A) The employee was already planning to leave at the time of dismissal B) The employee knew when she accepted the position that it was insecure C) The employee was guilty of misconduct, although not amounting to just cause. D) Both A and B E) All of the above
To qualify as a patent, an invention must be all of the following except:
A) Useful. B) Novel. C) Valuable. D) Nonobvious.
In most contracts, promises of performance are not expressly conditioned.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)