What makes third-party sanctions more politically dangerous than other types of sanctions?
What will be an ideal response?
The downside to third-party sanctions is that the sanctioning country may end up sanctioning its own allies. For instance, the Helms-Burton sanction put significant stress on the diplomatic ties between Canada and the United States. States must therefore be careful when employing this kind of sanction.
You might also like to view...
The legal principle that a city can exercise only those powers expressly allowed by state law can be classified by which of the following terms?
a) home-rule city b) general-law city c) Dillon's rule d) enterprise zone e) extraterritorial jurisdiction
Explain how winner-take-all and proportional representation systems work and evaluate their significance for party systems
Answer:
President Nixon's decision to impound appropriations made by Congress could be used as evidence to support which of these arguments?
a. The American presidency has grown too powerful. b. Legislative deadlock necessitates an activist presidency. c. The U.S. Constitution expects too much of the president. d. Executive privilege is an essential feature of the checks and balances system.
According to Figure 2.5, which of the following is the largest of the Christian religious affiliations of Americans?
a. Mormon b. Catholic c. evangelical Protestant d. mainline Protestant