Frank and Rosa are arguing about morality. According to Frank, moral truths are absolute and are true for all people, regardless of their nationality or culture. Rosa disagrees, arguing that what is considered moral by one group of people may be considered immoral by another group of people. Rosa's arguments are similar to the views expressed by:
A. metaphysical dualists.
B. relativist theories of morality.
C. moral objectivists.
D. universalist theories of morality.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
Buddhism has distinguished between study monks and
a. Meditation monks c. Live monks b. Active monks d. Evangelical monks
In the context of Catholic natural law ethics, with which of the following statements would Thomas Aquinas agree?
A. Natural law ethics places too much emphasis on human autonomy instead of emphasizing God's guidance. B. Natural law provides universal morality and is binding on all humans. C. Natural law is a human construction that is as fallible and frail as the human psyche. D. Natural law is unknowable to humans, and people must rely in divine law to participate in natural law.
A good method for generating ideas for an argumentative paper is to organize your argument around one of the standard developmental patterns for writing essays (narration, illustration, definition, etc.).
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Peirce rejects three methods for arriving at belief. They are:
a. tenacity, authority, the a priori method. b. feelings, intuitions, science. c. deductive logic, inductive logic, modal logic. d. tenacity, convention, science.