What is the reasoning that supports this claim the book makes? "Being able to explain why an argument is unworthy of acceptance is a stronger demonstration of one's critical thinking skills than being able to remember the names of the different types
f fallacies."
What will be an ideal response
The terminology of logicians and other scholars who study arguments is valuable to the extent that it helps us remember the underlying ideas. But the key to learning is to practice and internalize the process of interpreting people's words correctly so that we can understand exactly what their arguments are, and then evaluating those arguments fair-mindedly. People with strong critical thinking skills are good at evaluating arguments because they can recognize logically correct forms of arguments as well as common mistakes that make an argument invalid, unwarranted, or fallacious. And, they can explain in their own words why one form is reliable and another is fallacious.
You might also like to view...
Feng shui is the ancient Chinese practice of positioning objects to maximize flow of ___________ energy
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).According to kant, because persons are ends they should never be used as means to ends. so, even if sacrificing one person saves millions it is not moral. For ex, if jihadist islamist terrorists say that if you kill one person, he will not detonate a dirty bomb in Starkville, it is not a moral action to kill the person to save the thousands.
a. true b. false
He proclaimed that a new "Yellow Heaven" mandate was to replace the Han dynasty mandate
a. Chang Heng b. Chang Lu c. Ko Hung d. Chang Chueh
Given a reason offered in support of a claim, these are the four conditions that must be met for that argument to be considered worthy of acceptance. In order of their application, the third condition is
What will be an ideal response