In which case did the Court first reason that "preponderance of evidence" is NOT a sufficient basis for a decision when youths are charged with acts that would be criminal if committed by adults?
A) Kent v. United States B) McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
C) In re Gault D) In re Winship
D
You might also like to view...
Matching
1. Assumption of identity a. Michelle provided false information about herself and created a fictitious identity so as to engage in online flirtation. 2. Theft for employment b. Matthew used a stolen driver's license to open a fake bank account and acquire false credit cards. 3. Reverse criminal record identity theft c. Ashley stole personal information from her neighbor to create documents that helped her gain entry into the United States. 4. Virtual identity fraud d. Joshua changes physical characteristics, analyzes personal histories, and masters communication nuances of his friend Jason. 5. Credit or financial theft e. To protect herself from her criminal record, Amanda used her mother's ID to apply for government benefits.
Police are more likely to take action in cases that are of concern to a community.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
What is the only crime mentioned in the US Constitution?
a. larceny b. corruption c. treason d. murder
Sam is a 16-year-old sex offender who has a history of depression and substance abuse. Research suggests that a ______ will be most effective for Sam.
A. state facility with intense supervision B. state facility that focuses on low-risk offenders C. community-based program that focuses on a therapeutic intervention D. program that focuses on suicidal treatment