Sarah previously executed a power of attorney appointing her friend, Nancy, as her agent. Nancy has a copy of the power of attorney. Recently, Sarah and Nancy got into a huge fight. In fact, Sarah no longer trusts Nancy and does not think they will ever be friends again. What should Sarah do?
What will be an ideal response?
Sarah should execute a revocation of power of attorney and provide it to all third parties who may have had a copy of the original document. It is also a good idea to record the revocation of power of attorney if Sarah is concerned that Nancy will misuse the original document.
You might also like to view...
RoofCo establishes that on the day of the accident two employees of the general contractor, an employee of a painting subcontractor, and the city building inspector were on the roof on the day of the accident. In his suit, Roscoe:
a. Will likely not prevail on a theory of res ipsa loquitur because roof tiles regularly fall off roofs without anyone being negligent. b. Will likely not prevail on a theory of res ipsa loquitur because Jacob should have anticipated a roof tile would fall on him. c. Will likely not prevail on a theory of res ipsa loquitur because there is evidence RoofCo was not in exclusive control of the roof. d. Will likely prevail on a theory of res ipsa loquitur because all elements of res ipsa loquitur appear to have been met.
Rules of procedure establish the step-by-step mechanics that people bringing or defending a lawsuit must follow
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What happens when a person dies without a will?
What will be an ideal response?
Discuss the potential sources of inaccuracy for job analysis information/processes.
What will be an ideal response?