List the long-arm bases of obtaining personal jurisdiction against a nonresident under the UIFSA.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The nonresident happens to be in the forum state and is personally served while there. The nonresident submits (i.e., consents) to the jurisdiction of the forum state. The nonresident once resided with the child in the forum state. The nonresident once resided in the forum state and provided prenatal expenses or support for the child. The child resides in the forum state as a result of the acts or directives of the nonresident. The nonresident engaged in sexual intercourse in the forum state and the child may have been conceived by that act of intercourse. The nonresident asserted parentage in the forum state. Any other basis consistent with the constitution of the forum state and the U.S. Constitution for the exercise of personal jurisdiction.
You might also like to view...
What are the three steps of rapid prototyping?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following constitute obstruction of justice?
A) Hiding, changing, or destroying documents related to a judicial proceeding. B) Encouraging or giving false testimony. C) Intimidation, threats, or harm to witnesses D) Intimidation, threats or harm to judges, jurors, or others involved in a legal proceeding. E) all of the above
Secondary authority cannot be mandatory authority.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
In the case of Sellers v. Qualls 1954, the court found that odd eating habits did not make the will not of sound mind based on:
a. low IQ b. Eccentricities c. Lack of personal hygiene d. Insane delusions