Explain the reason for reduced individual Fourth Amendment protections at international borders
What will be an ideal response?
The strong government interest in controlling who and what enters the United States is balanced against the significant reductions of individual Fourth Amendment rights at international borders. Routine detentions at international airports, seaports, and the Canadian and Mexican land borders do not require reasonable suspicion to back up lengthy detentions and frisks, including examining purses, wallets, pockets, and even up-close dog sniffs.
You might also like to view...
Law enforcement capabilities and criminally useful technologies generally parallel one another
a. True b. False
Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding the knock and announce rule under common law?
a. English common law required police offices to announce their presence and wait for the home owner to open the door. b. English common law permitted police officers to break down the home owner’s door if the home owner refused to allow them in the home to execute the warrant. c. English common law did not require that police officers wait for the home owner to open the door and allow entry—they simply had to announce their presence and proceed to enter the home. d. The English common law approach is the basis of the modern day knock and announce rule.
The concept of parole was initially implemented, along with indeterminate sanctioning, in the 1870s by ________.
A. John Augustus B. Zebulon Brockway C. Captain Alexander Machonochie D. the United States Parole Commission
Which of the following means that the accused is released with the assumption that he or she will show up for scheduled court hearings?
A) Delayed booking B) Secured bail C) Deposit bail system D) Release on recognizance