In State v. Armstrong, the appellate court identified several factors that a judge is to consider in determining if a child if competent to testify. Which of the following is not one of those factors?
a. The child’s ability to receive accurate impression of fact or to observe acts about which he or she will testify
b. The child’s ability to recollect accurate impressions of fact or his or her observation of acts
c. The child’s maturity for his or her age
d. The child’s understanding of truth and falsity
c. The child’s maturity for his or her age
You might also like to view...
A licensed trial lawyer hired or appointed to conduct the legal assistance of a person accused of a crime and to represent him or her before a court of law is called __________ counsel
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
______ will be ascribed to those who acted carelessly resulting from failure to discharge a morally imposed duty to take care or behave reasonably toward others.
What will be an ideal response?
Robbery, rape, auto theft, and murder are examples of ________
A) Part II offenses B) Part I offenses C) Status offenses D) Misdemeanors
One who produces counterfeit securities with the intent to defraud a potential buyer of same would be guilty of the crime of _________
a. malicious mischief b. robbery c. extortion d. forgery