How should researchers proceed when results do not meet expected outcomes or are not consistent with the theories addressed?
What will be an ideal response?
The researchers may need to propose alternative explanations when the results do not
meet expected outcomes or are not consistent with the theories addressed. It is important that
the researchers systematically address any results in which there is some discrepancy from what
was expected based on other research or based on the hypotheses presented. In addition, this
analysis should include speculation regarding why such alternative findings were obtained.
You might also like to view...
Which group immigrated to the United States to work on the transcontinental railroads?
a) Vietnamese b) Koreans c) Chinese d) None of the above
_________ prevention is characterized by its before the fact quality; its intentional and group/mass orientation
a. primary b. secondary c. tertiary d. community
A client insists he has not used drugs in six months, however, the clinician
has received a positive drug screen on this client for each of the past six months. What is the most appropriate score for the confidence rating? A. Treatment not indicate (no problem) B. Treatment probably not necessary (slight difficulty) C. Some treatment necessary (moderate problem) D. Treatment absolutely required (extreme difficulty)
The stress generated by listening to multiple stories of trauma that clients bring to therapy may lead to a deterioration of the counselor's resiliency or coping abilities over time is defined as a. companion fatigue
b. empathy fatigue. c. victorious trauma. d. secondary pneumatic stress.