In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court forbid the execution of offenders under the age of eighteen?
A. Roper v. Simmons (2005)
B. New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985)
C. Board of Education v. Earls (2002)
D. Fare v. Michael C. (1979)
Answer: A
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is not true regarding consent?
A. During a paid occupancy, a hotel manager cannot give valid consent to enter or search the guest's room. B. In situations where police lack probable cause to arrest or search, valid consent may be the only means of conducting a search to obtain evidence. C. Consent obtained by someone who reasonably appears to have authority over the place to be searched may be deemed valid even if that person had no actual authority to authorize that consent D. Consent obtained during an unlawful detention may still be deemed valid if the prosecution can prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the police were unaware of the fact that the detention was unlawful.
Why does the law punish the offense of compounding a crime?
What will be an ideal response?
Hawaii and this other state have implemented unified family courts.
What will be an ideal response?
Under Texas law, for a robbery to occur, the offender must make a verbal threat
Indicate whether the statement is true or false