Mr. Marsh is anxious to begin his research study, and he jumps right in without gaining approval of his study through the IRB. Additionally, he has not asked his research subjects to sign a consent form
The study is not being sponsored by any federal agency or through the Food and Drug Administration. What are the legal and ethical implications of Mr. Marsh's actions?
What will be an ideal response?
The research is not legally required to have IRB approval, but ethically it is. Additionally, his peers may not accept his research without it meeting professional standards of human subject protection. Mr. Marsh is bound by ethical codes including
the Nuremburg Code to protect his study subjects.
You might also like to view...
California's subculture today is described as
a. moralistic b. traditionalistic. c. individualistic. d. none of these.
Which of these is a result of the tort reform movement?
a. Citizens have less ability to file class-action suits. b. The fees of trial lawyers are limited in some cases. c. Companies whose products meet government standards are immune from suits. d. Civil courts are less important and have less discretion. e. All of these are results of the tort reform movement.
The annual U.S. budget process causes problems for military procurement for what reason?
A. It requires generalization of weapons across all branches. B. It ensures expensive research and development costs over the different branches. C. It creates the possibility that an ongoing system may not be funded. D. It violates the nature of the iron triangle arrangement between Congress, DOD, and contractors.
Under liberal policies, which of the following is likely to receive the least amount of attention?
a. international cooperation b. economic development c. military strength d. environmental sustainability