Is judicial review democratic? Discuss both the democratic and undemocratic aspects of judicial review.
What will be an ideal response?
The ideal answer should include:
1. Judicial review entails judicial structures establishing the final interpretation of what the constitution and the laws mean, including the right to reinterpret, revoke, or overrule the policy decisions of the other political structures, including the executive, legislature, and administrative branches.
2. Research has revealed that judicial structures in many advanced democracies have exercised increasing power to redefine and overturn the actions of the other branches. That can potentially be undemocratic since judges are not usually elected or accountable to the people. This is troubling since crucial interpretations and decisions can hinge on a bare majority vote by a tiny number of people.
3. On the other hand, even in countries where top judicial officials are appointed, their authority is derived directly from the elected officials, whose power is based on popular consent. Thus, empowering appointed judges is fully consistent with democratic principles.
You might also like to view...
Radio flourished after the end of which era or event?
A) World War I B) Herbert Hoover's presidency C) Franklin Delano Roosevelt's presidency D) World War II E) the Civil War
Selective sales taxes in Texas are
A) applied to liquor sales. B) applied to real estate sales. C) not considered a hidden tax. D) all of these choices are true.
The best example of government by proxy is
A) voters electing their representatives. B) FEMA employees responding to a disaster. C) postal workers delivering the mail. D) private employers withholding taxes from your paycheck. E) enlisted soldiers serving in Afghanistan.
What can the humanist, pluralist, and formal approaches contribute to organizational theory?
What will be an ideal response?