Virginia Held's discussion starts with a case developed by
a. Bertrand Russell.
b. Bernard Williams.
c. Annette Baier.
d. Marilyn Friedman.
e. Daniel Dennett.
b
You might also like to view...
Some words are both vague and ambiguous.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Exercise: Are you familiar with the word, "ursine?" Provide a definition. If the term is unfamiliar, make a guess about its meaning based on its appearance or sound, and create your own definition. Then look the word up, and find out how close you got. (We provide a thumbnail meaning as answer.)
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Uncovering hidden premisses is an important part of reconstructing arguments
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Exercise: Work with two other people on this. For each question below, you need to do an Internet search. The primary purpose of this exercise is for you to (1) lay out a convincing argument as to why the source or sources you used to answer the question is/are trustworthy. In other words, you need to present an argument as to why you trust and believe the source you found on the Internet in answering the question. Your argument should use as support the sorts of criteria that give a source credibility as discussed in Chapter 4. You'll also need to (2) answer the question and explain the answer. You'll turn in one set of answers and arguments for the group. (Suggested time to complete: A week or week and a half to formulate arguments and answers.)Questions (your instructor may assign
others):1. What vegetable is toxic to dogs? Why, or why not?2. Can you catch a cold by going outside with wet hair? Why, or why not?3. Is it bad for your baby's health to dust a lot? Why, or why not?4. Are children riding in SUVs safer than those riding in passenger cars? Why, or why not? What will be an ideal response?