What did the events of 1956 in Eastern Europe teach Russian government officials?
A. That the U.S. would use force in defending anti-communist movements.
B. That they had to grant leeway for the adoption of some domestic reforms inside East European countries.
C. That there was only one road to Socialism.
D. That national independence for Eastern European countries was inevitable.
E. That Eastern Europe would unite into a politically unified state with or without Russian support.
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
How was the case of Briggs v. Elliot different from prior NAACP cases in education?
A) It involved medical-school education, rather than law school. B) It was the first case to involve elementary-school education. C) It was the first successful desegregation case. D) It was a loss for the NAACP and resulted in large setbacks.
Alexander Hamilton served as Washington’s __________
A) secretary of state B) secretary of the treasury C) secretary of war D) secretary of the interior
Francisco Pizarro was able to conquer the Incas because
a. his army outnumbered the Incas, and his army had superior weapons. b. the Incas thought he was a god. c. he deceived, captured, and killed the Inca emperor. d. All of these answers are correct.
Tito's argument about Yugoslavia being part of the buffer zone between East and West was a. that he retained Yugoslavian nationalism at all costs b. he rejected Communism entirely and moved towards democracy c. the Communist Party in Yugoslavia rejected Stalinism, not Communism
d. "Socialism in one Nation" was a working mantra. e. Yugoslavia was dependent on western political ideas as part of their inclusion in NATO.