According to the Tarasoff vs. Regents of the University of California decision, which of the following takes precedence when a client admits to wanting to kill another person?
A) Duty to client autonomy
B) Duty to be culturally congruent
C) Duty to warn
D) Duty to protect client confidentiality
Ans: C
The landmark Supreme Court case, Tarasoff vs. Regents of the University of California, has reshaped the configuration of psychiatric practice and altered the relationship between clinicians and public authorities. The duty to warn takes precedence over the duty to protect confidentiality.
You might also like to view...
Order: erythromycin 350 mg, PO, q8h. Available: erythromycin estolate 250 mg/5 mL How many mL should be given per dose?
What will be an ideal response?
School nurses give comprehensive nursing care to the children and staff at a school. Which of the following are also activities school nurses may do?
1. Care for children who are home sick from school 2. Coordinate the education program of the school and consult with school officials to help identify and care for other persons in the community 3. Allow students with communicable diseases to attend classes 4. Provide tertiary levels of are as their primary focus
____, _____, & _____ may fast
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The use of empathy and support begins in the stage of the nurse-client relationship termed the
A. orientation stage. B. working stage. C. identification stage. D. resolution stage.