If we as individuals would continue to spend more than we made, we would sooner or later have to pay up or go bankrupt. Our government is in the same position or will be unless we get serious about our liabilities and reduce expenditures enough to reduce the deficits or increase revenues enough to pay our bills and have some left over to pay the old bills. Evaluate this statement.

What will be an ideal response?


To begin with, most individuals do spend more than they make for a substantial segment of their lives and incur sizable debt. What is important is the expectation about their ability to pay. For example, a $100,000 mortgage for a wealthy person may be insignificant debt, while a $100,000 debt for someone making $20,000 per year is alarming. The same is true for corporations. Corporations are able to borrow against their assets and earning potential, and are able to refinance debts periodically.
Governments are in an even stronger position than individuals or businesses because they have the power to tax and create money to pay their debts. As long as debt does not become large relative to the earning capacity of the government there should be no danger of bankruptcy since governments have the confidence of their citizens and can borrow or tax. There is also the point that governments, like private citizens and businesses, should borrow for productive purposes. If this is the major purpose for the borrowing, then it adds to the nation’s future income-earning potential and the ability to continue to pay interest on the debt. To summarize, governments are not in the same position as private individuals since they have virtually unlimited power to tax, and they do not have limited life spans.
On the other hand, it should be pointed out that irresponsible, excessive borrowing is not healthy for the economy or the people’s faith in its government.

Economics

You might also like to view...

The Ricardo-Barro effect says that

A) government budget deficits have no crowding out effect because taxpayers increase their savings to match the quantity of loanable funds demanded by the government. B) government budget deficits crowd out private investment and thereby lower the real interest rate. C) government budget deficits resulting from an increase in government expenditure have no effect on investment but government deficits resulting from a decrease in taxes crowd out investment. D) government budget deficits cause households to save more in anticipation of higher taxes, which causes higher real interest rates.

Economics

The graph shown demonstrates a tax on buyers. Which of the following can be said about the effect of this tax?



A. The price paid by buyers is greater than that received by sellers, and the difference is the tax wedge.
B. The price paid by buyers is less than that received by sellers, and the difference is the total tax revenue.
C. The price paid by buyers is greater than that received by sellers, and the difference is the total tax revenue.
D. The price paid by buyers and received by sellers is higher than it was before the tax was imposed.

Economics

What is the opportunity cost of a decision?

What will be an ideal response?

Economics

Briefly explain the reason for the Law of Increasing Opportunity Cost.

What will be an ideal response?

Economics