Describe what it meant by dividing and joining use cases
What will be an ideal response?
A use case is defined by one primary actor, one useful goal, and one system. In other words, if a use case has more than one strong candidate for primary actor, or aims at more than one (complete) useful goal, or models the behavior of more than one system or subsystem, it must be broken into more than one use case.
There are, however, other reasons for dividing use cases or joining them wholly or partially: A use case may become too complex to understand and manage, or the discovery of common functionality among multiple use cases may require that "reusable" use cases be created. The mechanisms of "extend" and "include" are then used to relate separated or recombined use cases back together.
A use case may be divided vertically by consolidating parallel steps within a use case into another use case, or horizontally by taking out a set of steps. Refactoring is a special case of horizontal division in which a set of steps common to multiple use cases are extracted and joined.
You might also like to view...
Data that can be presented in a pie chart may also be presented in a bar chart, but the reverse is not always true
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Consider the portion of the sensitivity analysis report that follows. Decreasing the right-hand side constraint by 1 unit for $I$8 (from 150 to 149) will result in which of the following?
A. decrease the profit by $0.6
B. increase the profit by $3.2
C. increase the profit by $0.6
D. decrease the profit by $3.2
Which of the following is correct with regard to an accountant's contractual liability?
a. An accountant is bound to perform all the duties she explicitly agrees to perform. b. An accountant implicitly agrees to perform a contract in a competent and professional manner. c. An accountant who breaches his contract with a client may also be liable to a third party intended beneficiary. d. All of these are correct.
Why is public relations an important form of communication about a company? Discuss negative public relations, and give an example.
What will be an ideal response?