Explain why capital punishment is not unconstitutional as "cruel and unusual" punishment.
What will be an ideal response?
Because the language of the Constitution states that "No person shall be held to answer for a capita or otherwise infamous crime unless on a presentation or indictment of a Grand Jury" we can assume that this form of punishment was thought acceptable at the time that the Bill of Rights was written. To determine constitutionality by today's standards, courts look to find what the majority of society thinks. An indicator of this is whether or not a majority of the state legislatures find the punishment permissible. The last time the death penalty was challenged, the Supreme Court found that the majority of states did indeed allow for the use of the death penalty. The Justices assumed from this that most members of our society do not have their senses shocked by the use of capital punishment.
You might also like to view...
Modern laws view marriage much like a business ________, where, upon dissolution of the entity, the partners are entitled to a fair division of the marital assets.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The "special injury" requirement makes it easier for private plaintiffs to bring nuisance claims.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
One can commit an act of negligence without actually causing harm to the plaintiff
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain the differences between applications and specialty applications software
What will be an ideal response?