What is your opinion of the Supreme Court?s decision in Terry v. Ohio? Is the decision too restrictive or not restrictive enough?
What will be an ideal response?
Good answers should explain the Terry v. Ohio reasoning of allowing the police the leeway in detecting crime in appropriate circumstances yet in a limited way. Then the issue becomes whether the Supreme Court has found the right balance. Students need to support their positions with by distinguishing the Terry rules with how the doctrine has been expanded. The focus should revolve around a reasonable expectation of privacy.
You might also like to view...
Common law refers to the laws of specific villages and localities that wereoften enforced by canonical courts
a. True b. False
The chief theoretical obstacle to the Supreme Court creating a rule that allows individuals to sue federal officers in federal courts for constitutional violations was sovereign immunity
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
The principle according to which a guardian or an agency is given the rights, duties, and responsibilities of a parent in relation to a particular child or children is known as ________
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The United States employs a national standard approach to sentencing
Indicate whether the statement is true or false