The Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc v. PSKS, Inc case held that:
a. vertical agreements establishing minimum resale prices should be judged by the rule of reason standard.
b. vertical agreements establishing minimum resale prices are illegal per se.
c. horizontal price fixing agreements must be evaluated by studying the reasonableness of the restraint in light of real market forces at work in the situation.
d. if a seller can show it costs less to sell to a particular buyer, the seller may lawfully pass along the cost savings.
a
You might also like to view...
Discriminant analysis can be used to answer questions such as ________
A) How much of the variation in sales can be explained by advertising expenditures, prices, and level of distribution? B) In terms of demographic characteristics, how do customers who exhibit store loyalty differ from those who do not? C) What are the distinguishing characteristics of consumers who respond to direct mail solicitations? D) Both B and C are correct.
A company is deciding if it should design a product in-house or outsource the design. If outsourced, the cost for a low bidder would be $40,000, and the cost for an expensive bidder would be $100,000
To design in-house would require overtime for an already stretched design team with total costs of $70,000. If all three designs (in-house, low bid, high bid) are equal in quality and the likelihood of finding a low bidder is 60% (meaning that 40% of the time the firm will have to hire the expensive bidder), should the company outsource design or do it in-house?
Which of the following statements is true of green marketing?
A. It refers to the justification that a firm provides foremitting harmful greenhouse gases. B. Firms that follow green marketing are never consistent with profitability. C. It refers to the practice of making false claims about the benefits of a product. D. The vast majority of people are not willing to sacrifice convenience to buy green products.
Which of the following torts has as a required element of proof, an intent to harm
a. intrusion upon seclusion b. public disclosure of private facts c. placement in a false light d. intentional infliction of emotional distress