Anita and Steve were divorced in 2011. In their separation agreement, Anita agreed to carry their son, Joshua, on her health insurance. In addition, they both agreed to divide equally any of Joshua's uninsured medical expenses. The agreement specifically stated that Steve agreed to "pay 50 percent of the health insurance premiums Anita was paying." After the divorce, Steve claimed he should only
be responsible for 50% of the health insurance premiums paid for Jessie and not those paid for Rita's benefit. According to the terms of the agreement described above, Kelly's claim was denied. Which of the following characteristics of an effective separation agreement was not satisfied in this case?
A) The agreement is fair and freely entered.
B) The agreement is comprehensive.
C) The agreement accurately reflects the parties' intentions.
D) None of the above were satisfied.
C
You might also like to view...
Freddie resembles Brad Pitt, the famous movie actor. Enjoying this resemblance and making good use of it, Freddie impersonates Brad Pitt to gain admittance to the city's most popular nightspot for its New Years Eve celebration. Which of the following statements is true?
a. Freddie has committed the tort of intrusion. b. Freddie has committed the tort of appropriation. c. Freddie has committed the tort of negligence. d. Freddie has not committed an invasion of privacy tort.
Paralegals need to be confident because lawyers are:
A. Better at negotiating B. Have had formal education in how to form an argument C. Might ask a lot of questions to make sure you know your answer is correct D. Any of these
Concurrent jurisdiction
What will be an ideal response?
There are three categories of key facts mentioned in the text.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)