In Hughes v. Oklahoma, Oklahoma law forbid the export of natural minnows, to help protect the state's natural resources. When this law was challenged, the Supreme Court held:
a. Oklahoma has a paramount interest in preserving its natural resources, so the law stands b. Oklahoma has no interest in preserving minnows, so the law fails
c. Oklahoma was improperly "taking property without compensation"
d. regulation of fish falls under the Fish and Wildlife Service, so Oklahoma preempted a federal law e. none of the other choices
e
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a relation between the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility (GEF)?
A. The World Bank is responsible for managing the Trust Fund of the GEF. B. The World Bank determines what projects will be funded by the GEF. C. The GEF only funds nations that are members of the World Bank. D. The GEF is considered as the primary developmental arm of the World Bank.
An entrepreneur who takes unreasonable actions due to a lack of clarity about future events could suffer from ______.
a. deviance b. inattention c. lack of ability d. uncertainty
Bond A has a current yield of 6% and Bond B has a current yield of 8%. If the market price of both
bonds is the same, then the yield to maturity on Bond B must be higher than the yield to maturity on Bond A. Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What are the implications of industry transition to maturity for existing fast-food chains?****
What will be an ideal response?