Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the case that Josemaria has a weak credit score?
A) Josemaria is currently unemployed.
B) Josemaria gives money to charity.
C) Josemaria came from a low-income family.
D) Josemaria was not a finance major in college.
E) Josemaria recently defaulted on paying back a loan.
Answer: E
Explanation: E) Defaulting on a loan significantly impacts one's credit score for the worse. Choices A and B will not directly impact Josemaria's credit score, unless they mean he does not have enough money to pay back credit obligations. Choices C and D are not relevant to Josemaria's credit score.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is a factor that will help you direct a presentation specifically to an audience?
a. the location and occasion of the speech b. the audience's knowledge & experience c. the seating arrangement for the presentation d. all of the above.
The federal agency charged with the responsibility for conducting an integrated, coordinated attack on all forms of pollution of the environment is the ________
A) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) B) Global Environment Facility (GEF) C) Department of Environmental Management (DEM) D) Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
One objective of consumer sales promotion techniques is to encourage patronage for a specific retail store.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
CASE 21.3 In re Lehman Bros. Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation (2011) involved a question of whether rating agencies that helped select a pool of mortgages for a mortgage-backed security were "underwriters" under the 1933 Act or "controlling persons" under section 15 of the 1933 Act. How did the court rule?
a. The court ruled that the proof established that the rating agencies were both underwriters and controlling persons under the 1933 Act. b. The court ruled that the proof failed to establish that the rating agencies were either underwriters or controlling persons under the 1933 Act. c. The court ruled that the proof established that the rating agencies were underwriters under the 1933 Act but that the proof failed to establish that the rating agencies were controlling persons under the 1933 Act. d. The court ruled that the proof established that the rating agencies were controlling persons under the 1933 Act but that the proof failed to establish that the rating agencies were underwriters under the 1933 Act.