Explain how amicus curiae briefs allow parties to circumvent standing and ripeness
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Explain that the standing doctrines are meant to ensure that courts only hear cases between parties with an actual dispute in which there has been an actual harm.
2, Explain that the Supreme Court only hears cases that are ripe—where the issues are clear enough and sufficiently developed for the Court to weigh in.
3, Explain that an amicus curiae brief allows entities with a stake in the outcome but that are not directly involved in the case to submit legal arguments to the Court.
You might also like to view...
What proportion of Americans have private health insurance of some kind—either through an employer or purchased individually?
a. one-third b. one-half c. two-thirds d. three-fourths
Citizen journalism is possible due to ______.
a. the development of new technology b. the increase in educational levels of Americans c. the support of political parties d. the ability of news outlets to verify the accuracy of their reporting
In 1980, television networks were releasing their presidential predictions after the polls had closed on the East Coast. Which of the following would be a major criticism of this decision?
a. Exit polls in other areas had yet to be tabulated and were not inclusive. b. Exit polls were not predictively accurate enough to be of any use. c. This action could influence voters in other time zones around the country. d. Exit polling is seen as a disruption of the voting process and is illegal.
Which type of state budget can be used to finance investments in roads, bridges, buildings, and other infrastructure?
a. Capital budget b. Standing budget c. Balanced budget d. Operating budget