In _______________ (1969), the Supreme Court has refined the clear and present danger doctrine so that public advocacy may be prohibited only in situations when there is imminent lawless action
a. Cohen v. California
b. Flast v. Cohen
c. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
d. Brandenburg v. Ohio
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
Each of the following is an accurate statement about Strickland v. Washington (1984), EXCEPT
A. A defendant need not show prejudice to the case if there was a conflict of interest B. The performance of David Washington's attorney was deficient C. Guidelines as to whether attorney performance is reasonably effective are not specific D. Judicial scrutiny of counsel's performance must be highly deferential to the attorney
Racial profiling leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy in which investigation leads to more arrests, convictions and prison sentences
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Compare and contrast two alternative sanctions discussed in the chapter. Include your own evaluation of the effectiveness of these sanctions.
What will be an ideal response?
The result of the Marbury v. Madison (1803) case was that the U.S. Supreme Court decided for itself that:
a. The Supreme Court was one of limited power b. The Supreme Court could not invalidate the Judiciary Act of 1789 c. The Supreme Court could invalidate executive and legislative acts d. The Supreme Court could be in recess nine months out of the year