In Parish v. ICON, where a person was severely injured when jumping on a trampoline and sued its maker and the maker of a safety net for failure to warn, the Iowa high court held that:
a. the makers had no duty to warn because the danger was obvious
b. the makers had a poorly designed set of instructions, so could be liable c. the makers had failed to produce any warnings, so were liable
d. produced products that should never have been placed on the market because they are so dangerous that warnings are unhelpful
e. none of the other choices
e
You might also like to view...
Emmett has always wanted a sports car. He has finally graduated from college and is working at his first job. He realizes to make his dream come true, he needs to save up for a down payment and then work out how he will pay the monthly loan amount. Using goal-setting theory, give the direct and indirect effects of Emmett’s scenario?
What will be an ideal response?
The (residence, residents) of the community cannot agree (among, between) themselves on the new parking rules
What will be an ideal response?
?A list of all possible outcomes of an experiment is called the
A. ?sample space. B. ?sample point. C. ?event. D. ?likelihood set.
Indirect labor would be included in factory overhead
Indicate whether the statement is true or false