What did the Supreme Court decide in the Dred Scott case? What were the implications of the ruling?
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: The ideal answer should include:
The court ruled that residence on free soil did not render a slave a free person.
The court went further and declared that blacks were not full citizens of the United States.
In effect, the Court declared unconstitutional the Compromise of 1820.
The ruling threatened the freedom of free people of color and extended the reach of slavery into the North.
You might also like to view...
The Denmark Vesey slave revolt failed when
a. Vesey was killed. b. a white overseer overheard the plotters. c. a letter from Vesey was intercepted by authorities. d. Vesey was sold by his master. e. slaves betrayed the plotters.
President Harry Truman’s UN policies on colonization and racial discrimination were initially shaped by __________
A) the American experience in World War II B) American race relations at home C) worsening relations with the Soviet Union D) his unofficial advisors on race issues
Discuss the significance of the domestication of horses and the invention of the chariot during the third and second millennia B.C.E. What does the presence of structurally similar chariots from the Mediterranean to China tell us about the various civilizations dotting the Afroeurasian landscape?
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following statements was not true of the Spanish colonial administration in the New World?
A) All Indians were enslaved and all Indian land was confiscated. B) The Spanish monarch promoted a broad-based debate about the rights of Amerindians and religious conversion. C) The Council of the Indies provided centralized supervision. D) The New World was divided into two viceroyalties: New Spain and Peru. E) Many official documents, especially in New Spain, were written in Nahuatl, the Aztec language.