To be held responsible for a strict liability tort, there does not need to be a showing of intent to cause injury or negligence.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
True
To be held responsible for a strict liability tort, there does not need to be a showing of intent to cause injury or negligence. Strict liability torts impose legal responsibility for injury even though a liable party neither intentionally nor negligently causes the injury.
You might also like to view...
Americans tend to be linear or sequential in their deal-making, whereas non-Western cultures tend to be ______ in their approach to a deal.
a. individualistic b. relativistic c. sociable d. holistic
The union has not filed copies of its constitution, bylaws, and annual financial reports with the federal government. The union is likely in violation of the ______.
A. Railway Labor Act of 1926 B. Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 C. Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act) D. Labor Management Reporting Disclosure Act of 1959
Bridget is considering how to get to work over the summer. She has two options. Option A is to buy a seasonal bus pass for $100. Option B is to pay $.25 for each ride. Identify the fixed and variable costs for each option
If she has to ride both to and from work, how many days of work would it take for the seasonal pass to cost the same amount as Option B?
Which of the following would not be classified as a Current Asset:
A. Equipment B. Cash C. Accounts Receivable D. Supplies