Explain how the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 creates controversy between supporters of the individual-rights perspective and the public-order advocates
What will be an ideal response?
The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was a federal legislative response to the events of September 11, 2001, that provided law enforcement with new tools to combat terrorism. In order to deter and thwart the growing threats to American society, surveillance has shifted from reactive to proactive. These proactive antiterrorism efforts involve a wide variety of new intelligence activities designed to improve public safety. However, as the USA PATRIOT Act broadens the power of federal law enforcement agencies to conduct surveillance, the controversy between individual-rights advocates and public-order advocates deepens. On one hand, those who support the individual-rights perspective would question whether excessive surveillance by some law enforcement agencies might exceed what is necessary to protect members of society. On the other hand, the public-order advocate would acknowledge that if people are to feel safe in their homes, at work, or in travel, personal freedoms must be limited in order to protect all members of society. Balancing the concerns of both the individual-rights advocate and the public-order advocate will continue to create new challenges for the criminal justice system.
You might also like to view...
_____ created the term white-collar crime to describe crime committed by and within corporations
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
A liquor store may not sell liquor before
a. 10 A.M. b. 11 A.M. c. 12 A.M. d. None of the above is correct.
Home incarceration requires offenders to be in their homes at specific hours each day, usually at night
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is described as a view of all social events as a distinct chronicle of unique happenings?
a. Historicism b. Scientism c. Operationalization d. None of the above