Suppose a man commits a crime in a particular state and is convicted based on a confession. Later, a federal court declares that his Constitutional rights were violated because the confession was coerced and given without a Miranda warning. Which of the following is most likely to happen?
a. The conviction will be overturned and the man will be set free because double jeopardy has attached and he cannot be tried again for the same crime.
b. The conviction will be overturned and the man will be tried again for the crime, but the confession will not be allowed into evidence.
c. The conviction will be upheld, but the man will have his sentence reduced because of the rights violation.
d. This scenario could not happen because the federal courts have no jurisdiction over convictions based on state law.
b. The conviction will be overturned and the man will be tried again for the crime, but the confession will not be allowed into evidence.
You might also like to view...
Unions composed of government workers are becoming the most important part of the union movement.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
One important activity for members of Congress that is often criticized is
A) bringing federal dollars home to their district in the form of grants and federally-funded programs. B) securing pardons for criminals. C) working with other members to pass controversial legislation. D) helping members of the district negotiate the federal bureaucracy. E) All of the above
In 1776, one important reason that colonists regarded independence as a desirable alternative was that they
A. no longer had confidence that the British government would protect their liberties. B. could no longer afford the price of British exports. C. had come to reject the philosophy of John Locke. D. had come to reject British ideas of individual rights. E. were struggling economically.
Give three examples of how the media interprets and contextualizes news facts. Choose a story currently in the media and discuss how the context of the story could affect the public's perception of it
Introduce a change, real or imagined, to the story. How does the interpretation change? What will be an ideal response?