Define prior statements made by witnesses in relation to the hearsay rule and provide the rules by which such decisions would be used to rule whether hearsay would apply
What will be an ideal response?
There are three circumstances where a prior, out-of-court statement is not classified as hearsay. All three require that the person making the prior statement (the declarant) is present in court and subject to cross-examination about the prior statement.
If a witness testifies at a trial and can be cross-examined concerning an earlier statement made by the witness, the statement is not hearsay if the statement is inconsistent with the present testimony of the witness and was given under oath at a previous trial, hearing, or deposition; secondly, The statement is consistent and is offered to rebut a charge that the witness' present testimony is a recent fabrication or stems from an improper motive and lastly,
The statement is one of identification of a person made after perceiving that person.
You might also like to view...
The main actors in the federal judiciary are the men and women who serve as:
a. Judges b. Defense attorneys c. Prosecutors d. Jurors
Ethical issues surrounding the Stanford prison experiment include all of the following except:
What is school robbery?
What will be an ideal response?
The most expensive security incidents involve financial fraud.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.