Which statement explains how American judges differ from judges in nearly every other liberal democracy?
a. Unlike judges in most countries, American judges can exercise the power of judicial review.
b. Unlike judges in most countries, American judges have very little policymaking discretion.
c. With the exception of federal judges, American judges are usually involved in the political process.
d. With the exception of federal judges, American judges are usually interpreting code law rather than common law.
Answer: c
You might also like to view...
The "Iron Curtain" described the dominance of communism in which region?
A. Europe as a whole B. Southern Europe C. Northern Europe D. Eastern Europe E. Western Europe
What does the example of the Pentagon Papers illustrates about the doctrine of prior restraint?
A. The government can easily make a case that the press should not be allowed to publish national security documents while the nation is at war. B. The courts have been skeptical of the claims of the press, and the government can operate under a presumption of secrecy. C. Exercising prior restraint requires the government to demonstrate that the publication of documents would damage national security. D. The Supreme Court prefers to avoid these issues so the legislative and executive branches can resolve the problems.
International relations exists in a state of anarchy. In practical terms, this means that
a. nation-states do not have allies or principles, but instead only interests. b. only the United Nations has the power to resolve disputes between nation-states. c. there is no sovereign authority that resolve disputes or enforce international law. d. foreign relations is marked by unending conflict and war.
In recent years, funding for the HIV and AIDS crisis has leveled off in favor of increases in more ______ initiatives, such as increasing access to primary health care.
A. horizontal B. vertical C. humanitarian D. localized