What factors must be weighed to determine the viability of divesting an entire product line?
What will be an ideal response?
Traditionally, companies have resisted divestment for several reasons, such as these: divestment admits defeat in a previous decision, it necessitates changes in personnel, and it is contrary to the business ethic of expansion. These arguments still carry some weight. However, various possibilities are opened up by divestment, such as the fact that it releases assets for use in other parts of the business where opportunities are growing and it may improve the ROI. Thus, the divestment of the entire product line has become a viable strategic alternative.
You might also like to view...
Companies such as Kellogg, IBM, Microsoft, and Intel hire individuals from which one of the backgrounds below to help them better understand their competitors and predict their likely future strategies?
A) DEA B) FDA C) CIA D) FBI
In a(n) ________ franchise arrangement, the franchisee gains preferred exclusive access to the products manufactured by the franchisor.
A. business format B. supply-oriented C. standard D. product distribution E. exclusive
New Pay needs to vary in line with ______ performance.
a. individual b. group c. organizational d. individual, group and organizational
Dual listing of a stock leads to a decrease in the liquidity of the stock.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)