Why does fraudulent work sometimes get past the review system and get published?
a. The reviewers generally are not skilled enough to be able to identify fraud because reviewers are always junior and less experienced researchers
b. Editors don't spend enough time looking at the raw data that authors submit.
c. The review process for the paper was flawed and reviewers often do not have access to the raw data.
d. Reviewers have no trust in any authors and therefore always demand the raw data.
Answer: c. The review process for the paper was flawed and reviewers often do not have access to the raw data.
You might also like to view...
Regardless of the evidence supporting one or the other side of this argument, what do you think will be the actual drug control policy during the coming decade or two?
What will be an ideal response?
Using a blogger's entries as a digital journal of the blog writer's life to study an aspect of the blogger population is an example of using which type of unobtrusive method?
A) Official documentary records B) Accretion C) Physical erosion D) Archival strategies
Information giving may be important to constructive action by the client
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
What is a predisposition to critical events?
a. Antisocial behavior b. Bipolar c. Attendant effects of depression d. Comorbidity