Discuss three exceptions to the warrant requirement that would permit police to enter a home (where evidence might be seen in plain view). Give examples of each
What will be an ideal response?
The first exception is that of obtaining evidence after a "hot-pursuit" entry into private premises. An example would be where a person committed a criminal act out of a private dwelling and in an attempt to evade police ran into such dwelling. The police could then pursue the suspect in "hot pursuit" and the permissible scope of search must, therefore, at the least, be as broad as may reasonably be necessary to prevent the dangers that the suspect at large in the house may resist or escape. The second exception is that of an exigent circumstance. An exigency exists if law officers have no time to obtain a search warrant and have probable cause to believe that evidence will be destroyed or moved to an unknown place. The burden is on the law officers to show that a now-or-never situation exists; that is, the police must show that they needed to act immediately or else they would lose the opportunity to seize the evidence because it would be destroyed or moved to an unknown place. The third exception is that of obtaining evidence in emergency aid situations. Evidence found when police are responding to an emergency may be used in criminal trials. The courts sustained police action in the following examples: police arrested a driver who was under the influence of some substance. Police could search for and seize the substance the person took (cocaine) to aid the treating physician and to use as evidence. This also has been done in attempted suicides.
You might also like to view...
The United States Constitution says nothing specifically about white collar crime
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
________ policing is a strategy that puts the community-oriented policing philosophy into practice
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1. Modern advocates of the relationship between IQ and delinquency believe that one’s IQ is both inherited and acquired over time. 2. Psychopath, sociopath, and antisocial personality are all terms referring to the same phenomenon – the inadequately socialized personality. 3. A psychopath develops the same range of emotions as others but they experience those emotions at a much greater level. 4. The nature vs nurture debate questions whether criminality is explained by ones environment (nature) or gentics (nurture). 5. Not all biological differences are inherited as many may be due to the prenatal environment, injury, and inadequat diet.
Sanctuary allowed offenders to escape punishment as long as they were members of the clergy
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false