Many would argue that the federal government’s response to the financial crisis of 2008 favored powerfully connected financial firms at the expense of the average citizen. Would you agree or disagree with this statement? Why?
What will be an ideal response?
WHILE STUDENT RESPONSES WILL VARY WITH THIS QUESTION, STUDENTS SHOULD DISCUSS THE UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTION OF POWER BETWEEN FINANCIAL LOBBIES AND GROUPS LIKE OCCUPY WALL STREET. A DISCUSSION OF AGENCY CAPTURE AND THE FACT THAT THE HEAD OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND THE HEAD OF THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT WERE BOTH CROSSOVERS FROM THE FINANCIAL INDUSTRY MAY HAVE HAD A LOT TO DO WITH HOW THEY HANDLED THE CRISIS. THE QUESTION REMAINS—IS THERE SUCH A THING AS TOO BIG TO FAIL? DID THE GOVERNMENT MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE? STUDENTS SHOULD DISCUSS EVIDENCE ON BOTH SIDES IN PRESENTING THEIR ARGUMENT AND DEFENSE.
You might also like to view...
A __________ committee is a temporary committee that is appointed for a specific purpose
a. ways and means b. caucus c. select d. standing
Congress has sole oversight of the federal bureaucracy
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The purpose of the Three-Fifths Compromise was to
A) require a three-fifths majority to amend the constitution. B) effectively emancipate slaves in all states. C) ensure there were five "free states" for every three "slave states." D) count slaves as three-fifths of a person when determining a state's apportionment of representatives. E) provide voting rights to three-fifths of the slave population in each state.
An interview item that is incidental or unnecessary to the central aim of the study, but can be used to establish rapport, cool off a subject, or get the full story from the interviewee is a(n) __________
A) extra question B) throw-away question C) probing question D) essential question