Explain the concept of administrative justification and how it applies to vehicle and person inventories. Include relevant Supreme Court decisions in your answer
What will be an ideal response?
Good answers will discuss the basic non -criminal premise of administrative justification and the balancing between weighing citizens? privacy interests against the interest to ensure public safety. On vehicles inventories answers should address that inventories are taken after the fact (arrest or seizure) for the purpose of developing a record of what items have been taken into custody and recite the requirements for a valid inventory search. South Dakota v. Opperman is the seminal case for vehicles in general and Colorado v. Bertine is the case for containers within vehicles. For person inventories the justification includes: protection of a suspect?s property, deterrence of false claims of theft against the police, security, and identification of the suspect. Illinois v. Lafayette is the leading case on person inventories.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is true of arson?
A. It is a white-collar crime. B. It is accidental in nature. C. It involves the unintentional destruction of a building. D. It involves the malicious burning of an automobile.
Which of the following seeks to measure hidden crimes or the "dark figure of crime"?
a. NCVS b. NIBRS c. UCR d. IOCP
Differentiate passive and active electronic monitoring systems
What will be an ideal response?
State laws usually grant local governments the authority to impose limited curfews during emergencies where floods, fires, riots, looting, and other situations threaten the safety and welfare of a community
Indicate whether the statement is true or false