John is an internal investigator for a large retail store. He is watching a customer near the cell phone display on a remote camera. John starts the recording and continues to watch as the customer cuts the security cable with pliers of some sort and conceals the phone in his coat pocket. John then follows the customer out of the store and notes that no attempt to pay for the phone was made by
the customer. After stopping the man, John asks the customer/suspect if he has a receipt for the cell phone that he took.
What type of investigation is John conducting?
A) A reactive shoplifting investigation
B) A proactive shoplifting investigation
C) A T-5 shoplifting program
D) A combination shoplifting investigation
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
When using multivariate analysis, what are you able to state with confidence?
a. that you have looked at one variable and can analyze it b. that you have looked at two unrelated variables c. that you looked at the simultaneous relationships among several variables but this does not lead to interpreting their causal relationship d. that you looked at the simultaneous relationships among several variables and that as a result you can more fully understand the relationships between them
Which of the following is NOT considered by most persons as a mind-altering drug?
A) marijuana B) alcohol C) cocaine D) tobacco
An affirmative defense is one in which the defendant denies committing the crime or claims that the prosecution lacks sufficient evidence of the defendant's guilt
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
If two robbers agree beforehand to kill the clerk after getting the money “to eliminate the witness,” and if one of the robbers kills the clerk, the non-shooter would
(a) be guilty of murder under the felony-murder rule. (b) be guilty of murder under the vicarious-liability rule. (c) be guilty of murder under the provocative-act rule. (d) not be guilty of murder.