Franchise Termination. Heating and Air Specialists, Inc, doing business as A/C Service Co, marketed heating and air-conditioning products. A/C contracted with Lennox Industries, Inc, to be a franchised dealer of Lennox products. The parties signed a
standard franchise contract drafted by Lennox. The contract provided that either party could terminate the agreement with or without cause on thirty days' notice and that the agreement would terminate immediately if A/C opened another facility at a different location. At the time, A/C operated only one location in Arkansas. A few months later, A/C opened a second location in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Lennox's district sales manager gave A/C oral authorization to sell Lennox products in Tulsa, at least on a temporary basis, but nothing was put in writing. Several of Lennox's other dealers in Tulsa complained to Lennox about A/C's presence. Lennox gave A/C notice that it was terminating A/C's Tulsa franchise. Meanwhile, A/C had failed to keep its Lennox account current and owed the franchisor more than $200,000. Citing this delinquency, Lennox notified A/C that unless it paid its account within ten days, Lennox would terminate both franchises. A/C did not pay, and Lennox terminated the franchises. A/C filed a suit in a federal district court against Lennox, alleging in part breach of the franchise agreement for terminating the Tulsa franchise. Should A/C prevail? Explain.
Franchise termination
A jury found in favor of A/C on its breach of contract claims and awarded A/C $40,000 damages on the "Tulsa breach of contract" (but also awarded Lennox $233,236 on its counterclaim for A/C's outstanding account balance). Lennox (and A/C) appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Lennox argued that A/C's overdue account gave Lennox the right to cancel their agreement. The court agreed. The court pointed out that A/C's account was not current on the date Lennox withdrew permission for the sale of its products in Tulsa. The court also noted that under the UCC, if a buyer does not pay for goods on time, the seller can cancel the contract. Chronic failure to make timely payments has, in other cases, justified the cancellation of franchise agreements. A/C argued that Lennox had an obligation to provide notice to A/C and an explanation of all of its reasons for cancellation of the Tulsa franchise. The court pointed out that no notice is required under the UCC to cancel a contract for a failure to pay. "The reason is obvious; an aggrieved seller dealing with a buyer who is in breach of their contract should not normally be obliged to put the delinquent buyer on notice before terminating future relations." Lennox likewise "had no obligation to provide A/C with notification of its reasons for canceling the agreement permitting A/C to purchase products for resale in Tulsa. Thus, . . . Lennox's cancellation of that agreement was proper and A/C's breach of contract claim with regard to Tulsa fails as a matter of law."
You might also like to view...
Vegan Company reported the following: Common stock, $5 par, 200,000 shares authorized, 50,000 shares issued and outstanding What is the effect of issuing 2,000 shares of common stock in exchange for land with valued by a realtor at $36,000 if the common stock sells for $12 per share and is regularly traded?
a. The Land account increases by $24,000. b. Retained Earnings decreases by $10,000. c. Common Stock increases by $36,000. d. Additional Paid-in Capital - Common increases by $24,000.
Brief messages, such as emails or short presentations at meetings, ________
A) require elaborate outlines B) require the use of a tree chart in order to be outlined properly C) do not benefit from the outlining process D) might only need a few bullet points or questions as their outlines E) must follow a detailed traditional outline format
In Japan, principals are held liable for acts of agents within their limited range
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The Marcel Company is opening an office in Mexico. The cost to obtain electrical service is $500, but the clerk suggests that service could be started faster if an additional $50 is paid, which the clerk will keep. If the Marcel official pays the additional $50:
a. he will have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. b. he will not have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act because this would be considered a "grease" or facilitating payment, which is legal. c. he will be guilty of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act only if the payment was illegal under the written law of Mexico. d. he will be guilty of violating both the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Convention of Combatting Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.