According to the U.S. Supreme Court, how is compulsory self-identification not a violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments?
What will be an ideal response?
Court ruled that compulsory self-identification to law enforcement personnel was not unconstitutional and was not a violation of the Fourth Amendment's prohibitions against unreasonable searches and seizures nor was it a violation of the Fifth Amendment's protection from self-incrimination. In a nutshell, the Court ruled that compulsory disclosure of identification did not violate the Fourth Amendment because (1) it served an important government interest; (2) it was immediately relevant to the original purpose of a Terry stop; (3) the threat of criminal sanction was necessary for compliance; and (4) such a request would not alter the nature of the stop itself. In addition, the Court ruled that such compulsion did not violate the Fifth Amendment because the disclosure of identity, in and of itself, did not reasonably pose a danger of the self-incrimination forbidden by the statute. Thus, the Court ruled that in temporary investigative detentions, state statutes that require self-identification by private citizens are constitutional.
You might also like to view...
Studies show that sleep deprived detectives actually make fewer errors in collecting evidence at a crime scene
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
From the 1700s to the early 1800s, children were disciplined and punished for crimes
A. by the church. B. through an elaborate judicial process. C. by a jury of their peers. D. by parents and other adults in the community.
Which of the following acts of legislation protects government surveillance of private citizens suspected of international acts of terrorism?
a. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act b. Electronic Communications Privacy Act c. Kyllo v. U.S. d. the Nuremburg Code
The ________ Amendment states that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself."
A. Fifth B. Third C. Fourth D. Sixth