A suspect’s skin and blood are discovered at the scene of the crime. The DNA is run through the FBI’s DNA database and a positive match results, showing that the tissue belongs to Carl Doe. Will this evidence be admissible at trial?
a. No, because it is circumstantial evidence.
b. No, because Carl did not consent to having this sample run through the database.
c. Yes, because DNA evidence cannot be challenged.
d. Yes, because it shows that Carl was present at the scene.
d. Yes, because it shows that Carl was present at the scene.
You might also like to view...
The following are common to non-probate assets except:
a. they do not require any court proceedings to pass title from the descendant’s estate to the beneficiaries or heirs. b. they are not distributed according to the decedent's will. c. it is necessary to gain a court order to pass title for all non-probate assets. d. both a and b
_____________ is rapidly replacing paper format note taking
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Limited partners are not liablefor debts of the partnershipwhile it is doing business.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Briefly describe what a defendant is asserting if it raises the defenses of laches and estoppel.?
What will be an ideal response?