In the 1980s the CEO of Coca Cola corporation found out that its core business was making roughly 15% rate of return on investor capital
However, he also discovered that some of the newly acquired subsidiaries were not making anywhere near that amount. He decided to ask each of these companies to come up with a plan to push the rate of return closer to the 15% mark or he warned that these companies might be sold. Why would the CEO sell off companies or operations that are still profitable?
The opportunity cost of holding on to companies or operations that are making less than the core business is the difference in the profitability. Therefore, Coca Cola and its executive probably reasoned correctly that it could take sell those companies that were not hitting the 15% mark and reinvest the money in the areas of the company that were hitting the target rate of return.
You might also like to view...
The return to entrepreneurship is known as
A) economic profit. B) normal profit. C) opportunity revenue. D) normal revenue. E) explicit profit.
What is the difference between net exports and the current account balance?
What will be an ideal response?
Organizational structure can be a strategic asset if it
A) adds value. B) adds value and can be duplicated. C) adds value and cannot be duplicated. D) can be franchised.
Suppose the government imposed a carbon tax on firms that emit pollution. Then
A. the firms' marginal cost of production would increase, and the supply curves within the market would shift to the left. B. the firms' marginal cost of production would decrease, and the supply curves within the market would shift to the left. C. the firms' marginal cost of production would decrease, and the supply curves within the market would shift to the right. D. the firms' marginal cost of production would increase, and the supply curves within the market would shift to the right.