Suppose I learn from an excellent source the statistical fact that 35% of homeless people have alcohol dependence. I conclude that there is roughly a 35% probability that a randomly selected homeless person has alcohol dependence. What kind of reasoning is this?
a) representativeness heuristic
b) loose generalization
c) statistical generalization
d) statistical instantiation
You might also like to view...
The future like ours argument given by Don Marquis hinges on his claim that the fetus is a person with a right to life
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.One reason that a primary source can be difficult to read is that
A) we are not used to looking up words and references that we do not understand. B) such sources always take the form of technical essays. C) they must be read analytically, but not critically. D) such sources explain the ideas of others and therefore present second-hand information.
Which of the following problems does Christina Hoff Sommers highlight in her quest to return to virtue ethics?
A. the irony of students cheating in an ethics test B. the futility of conforming to societal standards C. the lack of good intentions on the part of instructors D. the scapegoating of one's peer in a tricky situation
Translate the following into a standard-form categorical claim: If it's a gigantosaurus, then it's bigger than a tyrannosaurus rex.
What will be an ideal response?