Determine whether the specified paradox occurs.In a small country consisting of 5 provinces, 300 federal judges are apportioned according to the population of each province. The population of each province is shown for the years 1995 and 2000. 
Does the population paradox occur using Hamilton's method of apportionment?
A. Yes
B. No
Answer: B
You might also like to view...
Multiply and simplify any radicals in your answer. Assume that all variables represent positive real numbers.
(
- 
)
A. 10
B. 
C. 
- 
D. 5
+ 5
Factor completely, if possible.20y2 + 23y + 6
A. (4y - 3)(5y - 2) B. Prime C. (20y + 3)(y + 2) D. (4y + 3)(5y + 2)
The following question refers to a country with six states. There are 250 seats in the legislature, and the populations of the states are given in the table below.
Find each state's apportionment under Webster's method.
A. State A: 29; State B: 135; State C: 11; State D: 41; State E: 14; State F: 20 B. State A: 29; State B: 136; State C: 11; State D: 42; State E: 13; State F: 19 C. State A: 29; State B: 133; State C: 12; State D: 42; State E: 14; State F: 20 D. State A: 29; State B: 134; State C: 11; State D: 42; State E: 14; State F: 20 E. none of these
There is to be a board meeting in the Success Unlimited Inc. boardroom. The chair of the board always sits at the head of the long rectangular table. There are three seats along each side of the table and one seat at the far end which no one ever uses. Six people should attend the meeting in addition to the chair. However, two people are out of town on assignment and a third person is ill. In how many different ways can the remaining people sit at the table?
What will be an ideal response?